Showing posts with label american politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label american politics. Show all posts

Special Trust Review

Special Trust
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Special Trust? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Special Trust. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Special Trust ReviewUnlike the reviewer below, I thought this book was refreshingly honest and self-effacing, and it by no means struck me as a typical "c.y.a." memoir. Bud McFarlane comes across as a dedicated, though perhaps not exceptionally talented public servant who performed a very important job (National Security Advisor) with an uncommon degree of modesty. I couldn't help but thinking that one of his major weaknesses as a player at these high levels might have been that he lacks the guile, expediency, and instinct for self-preservation that characterizes many who work in the upper echelons of government. In this respect, McFarlane stands in marked (and favorable) contrast to his most famous predecessor, Henry Kissinger.McFarlane may not be the brightest or the flashiest National Security Advisor we have ever had, but I came away from this book with a great respect for the man and the ideals of public service he brought to his position. The book is a riveting read, and McFarlane's judgments about the Iran-Contra affair and the culpability of others are eminently reasonable and compelling.Special Trust Overview

Want to learn more information about Special Trust?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...

Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf?, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th Review

Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th ReviewThere's a spiffy, hip kind of feel to this nouveau Wobblie update on how George W. Bush and his craven cronies and currish corporate sponsors are trying to turn America into a kind of gargantuan banana republic. Even if half of world-renowned journalist Greg Palast's indictment is even fifty percent correct, Momma, pack the kids and the dog and my old guitar: this country is going to hell.
I've got a friend or two who have actually left the good old US of A for places like Panama and Canada, not so much out of fear of a neo-fascist takeover, but out of pure disgust, the kind of disgust that can only be bought with stolen elections and massive redistributions of the nation's wealth from the poor and the middle classes to the conspicuously rich.
Before reading this I couldn't believe that the Democrats were so incompetent and so stupid as to allow the Republicans to steal two national elections. Now I wonder if it matters whether they can prevent a third. Probably Hillary will win, but after four years of her, the power structure will have had enough and it'll be the reincarnation of some cardboard flunky like Reagan or some idiot like the present occupant who will be installed in power and who will again rob the treasury, sell off the public lands and start a war for ExxonMobil and kill a gook for God.
People like Cheney and Rumsfeld will probably be dead or deathlike, writing their mendacious memoirs, but there'll be others from the think tanks and the corporate world to look out for the interests of the ruling class. And, yes, the rich will get richer and the poor poorer and there's nothing new under the sun--although this "nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal" once seemed so.
Goodbye yellow brick road. Welcome to the armed madhouse!
The problem with America, with this democracy by capitalism, is that it isn't what it once was. We used to be the greatest country on earth. But sometime around the time that Kennedy got shot we began to change. We won the Cold War but it ruined us morally. With our idealism and sense of fair play compromised by our need to stem the tide of the red menace, we became, step by step, like every other country in the history of the world, hopelessly corrupt.
Clearly, if Palast is to be believed, we are corrupt, right down to the very core of our being. When elections are stolen in a democracy, it is no longer a democracy. When a powerful nation invades another country to control the supply of oil (as Palast charges) under false pretexts, it is no different than Iraq invading Kuwait or Germany invading Poland.
When a country allows profiteers to poison and despoil the land and the people (as Palast charges) that country is no better than the robber barons of old or the dictators of South America and Africa. When the president steals from the middle class to feed the gluttonous, the middle class will eventually dry up and die and we will have the wealth distribution pyramid of a banana republic.
Obviously this book will delight and entertain those on the left. Palast is a gifted writer as well as a tenacious researcher who serves well as a pied piper to those about to be disenfranchised. (People on the right will send him death threats.) I suggest you read this book regardless of how you feel about what is happening in America today and who's responsible. If nothing else, reading Palast's prose is an education in how to express yourself with verve, gumption, and the employment of le mot juste. Here's an example from pages 262-263. Noting that 59 million Americans actually cast votes for George W. Bush in 2004 (regardless of whether he really won or not), Palast writes:
What we witnessed on November 2, 2004, was a 59 million strong army of pinheads on parade ready to gamble away their pensions so long as George Bush makes sure that boys kill each other, not kiss; who feel right proud that our uniformed services can kick some scrawny brown people in the ass in some far-off place when we're mad and can't find Osama; who can't bring themselves to vote for a guy with a snooty Boston accent who's never been to a NASCAR tractor pull and who certainly thinks anyone who does [sic] is a low-Q [sic] beer-burping blockhead.
Palast adds, "Nitwits who think Ollie North's a hero not a conman, who can't name their congressman, who believe that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were going steady, who can't tell Afghanistan from a souvlaki stand and, bloated with lies and super size fries, clomped to the polls 59 million strong to vent their small-minded hatreds on us all."
He sums that up with, "I fear the election was an intelligence test that America failed."
It is said that domesticated animals are not as smart as the wild kind. It is put forward that humans were smarter in, say, 30,000 BCE than we are now. Some call it "devolution." We are domesticated animals: we and the massage of TV and fast foods and soft couches, and the pounding rhythms of the ads relentlessly aimed at us, have domesticated ourselves. Nowhere in the world is this truer than in America. Alas.Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th Overview

Want to learn more information about Armed Madhouse: Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf, China Floats, Bush Sinks, The Scheme to Steal '08,No Child's Behind Left, and Other Dispatches from the Front Lines of th?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...

The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values) Review

The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values)? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values). Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values) ReviewIn his book The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Professor Ackerman begins by condemning the triumphalism that surrounds most discussions of the American Constitution. He professes to be (or to have been) a triumphalist himself, since his constitutional theory features a distinctive hero: not the Founders nor the New Deal's success in adapting classical constitutional forms reinforced by the Warren Court, but the ordinary American citizens who have shaped the country's fundamental commitments over the centuries.
But he also acknowledges that next to a bright side of American constitutional history stands a dark one. This is represented by the transformation of the presidency into a real and present danger to the American republic, as a result of developments that were not anticipated by the Founders: the rise of political parties, mass media, and massive bureaucratic and military establishments.
In view of this one must ask: can the transformation of American constitutional law described in The Decline and Fall of the American Republic be viewed in terms of Professor Ackerman's theory of constitutional moments? Furthermore, can his proposals concerning the reform of the presidency be attained by means of this theory? The answers to both questions are, I'm afraid, negative.
It appears there are several differences between the theory of constitutional moments and the transformations the American presidency is currently enduring. The theory of constitutional moments makes the best of a characteristic feature of the American system which consists in undercutting the pretensions of any particular branch to serve as the unique spokesman for the people. This means that a constitutional moment cannot really occur in a moment; it takes a lot of time before a political movement can obtain the popular support required to speak for the people. This is arguably what happened at the Founding, after the Civil War and with the New Deal.
But the strengthening of the presidency is not the result of a constitutional moment. This is because we are now confronted with real "moments" in time and precisely for that reason they are scarcely "constitutional". The president claims to be the only spokesman for the people with the exclusion of any other branch, not least because he pretends to act in response to an emergency situation (even if this situation will never end), and this claim makes obsolete the very distinction between constitutional and normal politics. Furthermore, this distinction is also made obsolete by a new feature of presidential politics, that is, government by the polls.
The pessimism persists if we turn to the question whether Professor Ackerman's proposals concerning the reform of the presidency - such as Deliberation Day, a National Endowment for Journalism, a new Canon of Military Ethics, the Popular Sovereignty to revise the Electoral College and the Supreme Executive Tribunal - can be attained by means of his theory of constitutional moments. In theory that would surely be possible, even desirable, since a "constitutional moment" is often triggered on by a "transformative president" who wants to inscribe a new constitutional vision into statute law and judicial precedents.
However, in the final pages of The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Professor Ackerman makes clear his opinion that President Obama is not up to the job of a "transformative president". But even if he were, one must ask: how transformative can one expect a president to be, if it's his own powers that are at stake? It seems that the internal logic of the theory of constitutional moments has been pushed to its limit.
So The Decline and Fall of the American Republic is really about the sinking of republican values as a basic pattern of the past two centuries of American constitutional history, a pattern so forcefully and brilliantly put up by Professor Ackerman in his past books.
Professor Ackerman thinks, however, that the death of the republic does not necessarily mean the end of democracy. Even if the American constitutional tradition is overwhelmed by presidential power he maintains that the presidency may well remain an elective office. I think this is part of an effort to save his theory of American constitutional history. But can we maintain a democracy without keeping it republican?

The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values) Overview

Want to learn more information about The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Tanner Lectures on Human Values)?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Review

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Review"Was you ever bit by a dead bee?" is the question Eddie (Walter Brennan) likes to ask in the Bogart-Bacall movie To Have and Have Not. The answer is "Yes Indeed!" as Molly Ivins shows in her posthumous book. But I don't really think of her as a bee, but maybe a Texas-size horsefly biting the backsides of those who would erode our freedoms, or perhaps a vigilant bulldog protecting the tree of liberty. Perhaps also "The wronging of rights and the righting of wrongs" might be appropriate here.
This is a book of episodes, stories about instances of where the Bill of Rights comes under assault. Many of the basic tales are familiar, but many are not, and putting these stories together helps give a better picture of the whole: we've been seeing a piecemeal erosion of freedoms done in the name of freedom. There has been no sudden assault on the tree of liberty by a dozen men with chainsaws, but rather more subtle attacks--slashes with hatchets done in the night. But Molly was never willing to accept any kind of assault. When you read the stories you realize that many of the instances didn't seem like such a big deal at the time--but they were to Molly. She quotes Niemoller's comment about Hitler: Hitler went after the communists, then the Jews, then the Catholics, and each time he didn't speak up because he wasn't one of them. Then when they came for him there was no one left to speak up for him. The same thing, of course, occurred under Stalin, and Molly reminds us that when we watch others having freedoms eroded and do nothing, we are in danger ourselves--that was her passionate concern, and it's one of her primary concerns in this book.
Molly is outraged by a lot of the things that are happening, but she has always been a writer of charm and humor. She writes of how war protesters in Crawford, Texas, were (are) regarded as essentially being terrorists, and how the police chief said that if someone walked down the street alone with a political button on his or her shirt that he didn't agree with, then he could arrest them for illegal protest. There is also a lengthy piece about a reporter in San Francisco who spent 199 days in jail for refusing to testify and turn over video footage. (This is not a tale I recall ever hearing of). During a disturbance, a taillight on a police cruiser was broken. Police departments get federal grants, and so the Feds got involved. The Feds insisted that the reporter testify about what he had seen and turn over all video footage. It sounds nonsensical, trivial, and a supremely idiotic waste of time for the Feds to get involved over a taillight, but the reporter still spent 6 months in jail, and Molly was outraged.
"We had to destroy it in order to save it" is a phrase we sometimes hear in wars, but even though it isn't being phrased quite that bluntly, it is being said about freedoms. Molly's book is about this: she's been our champion and stalwart defender, our watchdog. We'll miss her insights, her humor, and her outrage at wronged rights.Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Overview

Want to learn more information about Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...

Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive Review

Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive ReviewThis was a phenomenally fun and informative read. The book takes the most contentious issues relating to the executive branch and has the most brilliant scholars of the topics argue their respective points. The chapters address century old debates like whether we should abolish the electoral college, to less conventional debates like the abolition of the vice presidency.
The format is perfect for those new to the debates or well-versed in them. First, a synopsis and historical background of a particular controversy is given, followed by two thorough, but totally dichotomous perspectives. My only criticism is due to the fact only two arguments are presented for each topic. Obviously, due to space constraints, the book can not present a full-length explanation of each and every perspective, but at times the book makes it seem as if there are only two perspectives on the topic at hand, which is almost always false. This is a small critique given the overall quality of the work presented. The book, which is intended to be didactic, ends up being a very entertaining and thought provoking read.Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive Overview

Want to learn more information about Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives On the American Executive?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...