Showing posts with label patriotism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patriotism. Show all posts

Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage Review

Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage ReviewGaret Garrett was one of the standard-bearers of the Old Right: the pre-war conservatives who opposed the expansion of both the welfare and the warfare state. In this book, a collection of three long essays, he details powerfully and compellingly the course the United States took to transform itself from a limited, constitutional Republic, into a voracious, insatiable empire, regulating every detail of its citizens' lives at home and thrusting itself into every possible context abroad. This is the most important book I read this year, and it receives my highest recommendation.
Note: This book (without the foreword by Bruce Ramsey) is available for free download on the von Mises website.
The first essay, "The Revolution Was", is the most important in the book. It was written in 1938, and Garrett shows how the Roosevelt New Deal constituted a revolution that overthrew the American form of government. The first two paragraphs are so powerful, I will simply quote them: "There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs to freedom. There are those who have never ceased to say very earnestly, `Something is going to happen to the American form of government if we don't watch out.' Those were the innocent disarmers. Their trust was in words. They had forgotten their Aristotle. More than 2,000 years ago he wrote of what can happen within the form, when `one thing takes the place of another, so that the ancient laws will remain, while the power will be in the hands of those who have brought about revolution in the state.'"
He then goes on to detail the process by which this was accomplished, consciously, fraudulently, and against the will of the people. Roosevelt's platform contained three main planks, things for which he unceasingly criticized Hoover in the first election: (1) a drastic reduction of the size of government, to reduce spending by at least 25%; (2) a balanced federal budget; (3) a "sound currency maintained at all hazards". These were the policies for which he was elected to office. He was a liar and a traitor. Federal spending, government agencies, and federal deficits exploded to previously unimaginable sizes in the first two years of his administration (sound familiar, anyone?). Roosevelt demanded the American people exchange their privately held gold for government bonds that promised to repay in gold, but before that legislation was even passed the legislation was already drafted to default on the promise and seize the American people's gold. Garrett has quotes from Roosevelt's notes that show that he never intended to keep these promises: but he knew what he had to say to get elected. By these steps, and many others, a revolution was accomplished in the American government, and total power was centralized in the hands of an omnipotent federal bureaucracy, the one thing the drafters of the Constitution wanted to guard against at all hazards.
The second essay, "Ex America" examines the policies pursued during and following the Second World War, and especially how Roosevelt, once again lying to the American people and proceeding against their will, aggressively pursued involvement in the war, and was illegally carrying out war measures many months before Pearl Harbor was attacked. He shows how all the changes that had occurred in the last fifty years were effected before the people knew what was happening, when it was too late. The people did not vote for getting into World War I. They elected Wilson in 1916 on the slogan, "He kept us out of war." They did not vote for the New Deal. They elected Roosevelt on his promises of less government, balanced budgets, and sound money. They did not vote for World War II. They elected him again in 1940 on promises that he would keep them out of foreign wars at all hazards. They never voted for the welfare state. They never voted for United Nations. They never voted for a interventionist, meddling foreign policy. All of this was financed by confiscatory taxation, and, more importantly, inflation. But as these changes were effected, one by one, they were accepted with resignation, and there is no going back. Government only grows bigger, never smaller.
The third essay, "Rise of Empire", details the transition from a non-interventionist foreign policy, to imperialism: squandering the people's confiscated wealth on foreign aid in every corner of the world; putting power to declare war into the hands of the President so that we can be plunged into war at any time; subordinating every domestic concern to the militarism required by our new foreign policy of aggression; transforming a huge segment of the economy into war industry; entangling us in an enormous network of satellite nations that have to be continually supported and appeased; and using the environment of fear and war as the excuse for limitless expansion of state power and spending.
All of this is highly relevant now. "The People's Pottage" is a reference to Esau in the Bible, who sold his birthright for a "mess of pottage". Our birthright was freedom, and it was taken away without protest. The reason I believe this books is so important, is that it shows clearly that we did not lose our freedom with the election of Bush, as the leftists think. We did not lose our freedom with the election of Obama, as the neocons think. The Republican and the Democratic parties are the complimentary wings of the same monster: the American empire. The left supports war as long as it can have the welfare state, and the right supports the welfare state as long as it can have war. The result is what we have now, and it hasn't changed in my lifetime, nor is it likely to change before the empire bankrupts itself, as all empires in history have done. It happened long ago. "The Revolution Was."Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage Overview

Want to learn more information about Ex America: The 50th Anniversary of the People's Pottage?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Review

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Are you looking to buy Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Review"Was you ever bit by a dead bee?" is the question Eddie (Walter Brennan) likes to ask in the Bogart-Bacall movie To Have and Have Not. The answer is "Yes Indeed!" as Molly Ivins shows in her posthumous book. But I don't really think of her as a bee, but maybe a Texas-size horsefly biting the backsides of those who would erode our freedoms, or perhaps a vigilant bulldog protecting the tree of liberty. Perhaps also "The wronging of rights and the righting of wrongs" might be appropriate here.
This is a book of episodes, stories about instances of where the Bill of Rights comes under assault. Many of the basic tales are familiar, but many are not, and putting these stories together helps give a better picture of the whole: we've been seeing a piecemeal erosion of freedoms done in the name of freedom. There has been no sudden assault on the tree of liberty by a dozen men with chainsaws, but rather more subtle attacks--slashes with hatchets done in the night. But Molly was never willing to accept any kind of assault. When you read the stories you realize that many of the instances didn't seem like such a big deal at the time--but they were to Molly. She quotes Niemoller's comment about Hitler: Hitler went after the communists, then the Jews, then the Catholics, and each time he didn't speak up because he wasn't one of them. Then when they came for him there was no one left to speak up for him. The same thing, of course, occurred under Stalin, and Molly reminds us that when we watch others having freedoms eroded and do nothing, we are in danger ourselves--that was her passionate concern, and it's one of her primary concerns in this book.
Molly is outraged by a lot of the things that are happening, but she has always been a writer of charm and humor. She writes of how war protesters in Crawford, Texas, were (are) regarded as essentially being terrorists, and how the police chief said that if someone walked down the street alone with a political button on his or her shirt that he didn't agree with, then he could arrest them for illegal protest. There is also a lengthy piece about a reporter in San Francisco who spent 199 days in jail for refusing to testify and turn over video footage. (This is not a tale I recall ever hearing of). During a disturbance, a taillight on a police cruiser was broken. Police departments get federal grants, and so the Feds got involved. The Feds insisted that the reporter testify about what he had seen and turn over all video footage. It sounds nonsensical, trivial, and a supremely idiotic waste of time for the Feds to get involved over a taillight, but the reporter still spent 6 months in jail, and Molly was outraged.
"We had to destroy it in order to save it" is a phrase we sometimes hear in wars, but even though it isn't being phrased quite that bluntly, it is being said about freedoms. Molly's book is about this: she's been our champion and stalwart defender, our watchdog. We'll miss her insights, her humor, and her outrage at wronged rights.Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights Overview

Want to learn more information about Bill of Wrongs: The Executive Branch's Assault on America's Fundamental Rights?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now
Read More...